Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Harmful Traditional Health Practices among University Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Certain customs have their roots in cultures, religions, or the counseling of new mothers by family members.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from December 1st, 2025 to March 30th, 2026. The study included a convenience sample of 200 male and female staff members from different colleges at the University of Basrah, Bab Al-Zubair campus. Data were collected using a closed-ended questionnaire consisting of two parts: socio-demographic characteristics and questions related to the staff’s opinions about several traditional health practices. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 was used to analyze the data using both descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The results showed that most participants were university graduates (58.5%), while 23% had postgraduate degrees. The Participants demonstrated variable levels of knowledge, with persistence of several misconceptions. However, some incorrect beliefs were still present among the participants, such as using ash or flour to stop wound bleeding, hanging beads for neonatal jaundice, and using kohl to protect infants’ eyes. Significant correlations were found between knowledge scores and some demographic variables, including age, gender, and marital status.
Conclusion: The study concluded that despite relatively high educational levels among participants, some harmful traditional health practices are still believed and practiced. Increasing awareness and providing accurate health education are essential to reduce the spread of these misconceptions.
